> On 25 Jun 2017, at 1:37 am, Richard Gaskin via use-livecode
> <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> How many of you have never before known that commas are optional between
> definition arguments?
I have seen it before in user scripts but never used it myself. It’s one of
those things you discover (like when {} could be used interchangeably with [])
that you quickly realise you should never rely on so you forget pretty quickly
;-)
FWIW it actually wouldn’t be _that_ hard to add the ability to specify some
syntactic sugar to your handlers and have the parser ignore said sugar:
e.g:
command Foo “with” pBar
end Foo
Foo with pBar
However this is somewhat less than and conflicts with the open language concept
so it’s probably best not to consider it too seriously.
Cheers
Monte
_______________________________________________
use-livecode mailing list
[email protected]
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode
