sez hh:
> What you say is logically totally wrong.
Really. Did you read the sample code dunbarx posted? And if you read it, did
you understand it? Please, inform me which rawKeyDown events a "do rawKeyDown"
handler *will not* trap. As well, do clue me in to which rawKeyDown events will
slip thru a "on rawKeyDown" handle which *does not* have a "pass rawKeyDown"
statement in it.
> "DoScrollUpStuff" may of course easily be written such that Craig's
> script does the same as your script.
Of course. But it *wasn't explicitly written out*. And I was responding to *the
sample code that was actually written*, as opposed to… say… making unsupported
assumptions about *other* code that *could* have been written. Personally, I
find that dealing with the code that's *actually there* tends to yield better
results than dealing with code that I only *wish* was there. Your mileage may
vary.
Is the problem that I didn't comprehend dunbarx's sample code… or is the
problem that *you* hallucinated a statement or three which were not actually
present in said sample code? Yes, "hallucinated" is not a particularly
congenial word in this context, but it's no more offensive than your "logically
totally wrong" phrase. As the saying goes, "you don't start none, there won't
be none."
"Bewitched" + "Charlie's Angels" - Charlie = "At Arm's Length"
Read the webcomic at [ http://www.atarmslength.net ]!
If you like "At Arm's Length", support it at [
http://www.patreon.com/DarkwingDude ].
_______________________________________________
use-livecode mailing list
[email protected]
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode
