J. Landman Gay wrote:
> On 12/12/16 11:08 PM, Mike Bonner wrote:
>> I haven't tried it but, perhaps you could-- put url "
>> https://www.domain.com/folder/stack.livecodescript"; into url
("binfile:" &
>> specialfolderpath("temp") & "/thestack.livecodescript"
>> Then start using it from there.
>
> Hey, it works! Binary or script-only stack both. Clever. :)
If a binary stack can be used from memory only, it should not be
necessary to write a script-only stack to disk.
Such a requirement prevents us from using script-only stacks in secure
zero-footprint apps, such as those with the securityPermissions for
"disk" turned off.
If you haven't filed a bug report I cam do that.
I think it's useful to report any behavioral differences between
script-only and binary stacks, as they break the cardinal design mandate
that the only difference be the storage format.
--
Richard Gaskin
Fourth World Systems
Software Design and Development for the Desktop, Mobile, and the Web
____________________________________________________________________
ambassa...@fourthworld.com http://www.FourthWorld.com
_______________________________________________
use-livecode mailing list
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode
