At 7:39 AM -0800 12/1/2016, Richard Gaskin wrote:
BNig wrote:
Scott Rossi wrote
It's wrong but it's always been like this. LC doesn't like graphics
>> smaller than 9 pixels.
>
that is determined somewhat arbitrarily by the revBackScriptLibrary in
handler
on newGraphic
if the width of the target < 9 and the height of the target < 9 then
> .... use default values
Would that be a user experience bug?
What would be a good reason to prevent the user from doing a
reasonable action like this?
If the size is explicitly set, why not let it remain so?
I expect this was done to prevent the case where someone:
1. chooses a graphic tool from the Tools palette
2. clicks to start dragging out the graphic
3. accidentally double-clicks instead and ends the graphic, resulting
in an unintentionally-tiny graphic
It also lets you click once with a graphic tool to create a
default-size graphic at that spot.
Perhaps newGraphic could test what tool is chosen, and change the
size only if the tool is "graphic".
_______________________________________________
use-livecode mailing list
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode
