That's what I saw too in my experiment, but I was issuing commands from the
message box. When Graham did a "go stack invisibleStack" the defaultstack
didn't change to it.
From what Monte said, I'm guessing that Graham's running script was in the
original stack and maybe the engine hadn't done its swap yet.
--
Jacqueline Landman Gay | jac...@hyperactivesw.com
HyperActive Software | http://www.hyperactivesw.com
On October 8, 2016 6:17:48 PM "Jeanne A. E. DeVoto"
<revolut...@jaedworks.com> wrote:
At 3:54 PM -0500 10/8/2016, J. Landman Gay wrote:
I thought visibility might impact it (I believe that's the case with
Graham's stack) so I did some quick tests and even though there was
a visible mode-1 topstack, going to the invisible one did change the
defaultstack. Thus, my curiosity.
I quote: "The topStack is the frontmost stack with the lowest mode."
The mode runs from 0 to 13 (unless someone's added some modes
lately), and invisible isn't one of the modes-a toplevel visible
stack has the same mode as a toplevel invisible one.
(I don't claim this makes actual sense, mind you....)
--
jeanne a. e. devoto
livec...@jaedworks.com
_______________________________________________
use-livecode mailing list
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your
subscription preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode
_______________________________________________
use-livecode mailing list
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode
