> "LCB is less bad than most other languages" lol
On Mon, Aug 22, 2016 at 3:16 PM, Mike Kerner <mikeker...@roadrunner.com> wrote: > I can't stand strict. That's part of the reason why I choose to use LC > instead of C. I would rather have to find and fix typos in variable names > than have to coerce type changes when I want to do something with a > variable, or have to declare variable after variable after variable in a > block of code. How about case-sensitivity? Unfortunately, in LCB there is > more of that, as well. It annoys me. Our enterprise system's IDE is > case-sensitive, and every time I have to work on it I can't wait to be rid > of it. If you read through the code for some of the widgets in LCB, you > will either be overjoyed, or roll your eyes. LCB is less bad than most > other languages, but lazy compiler authors shouldn't win the day, the same > way that the personal trainer doesn't get to tell the client what they're > going to be doing for their workout, and grammar checkers don't get to > dictate your use of the subjunctive, or lack thereof. > > And long live synonyms. And beginning sentences or sentence fragments with > conjunctions. > > _______________________________________________ use-livecode mailing list use-livecode@lists.runrev.com Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode
