I seem to remember inserting the script of a stack into back at some point
in the past. I know for sure you can start using the stack which is
effectively the same thing.
The main thing is that you don't need to "go" there to load the stack into
RAM. Just putting it in use does that, as does accessing any property.
Referring to it in almost any way loads it. The one exception I can think
of is "there is a file" which only reads the file directory. But "there is
a stack" does load it, because LC needs to open and read the file to
ascertain its structure.
Jacqueline Landman Gay | jac...@hyperactivesw.com
HyperActive Software | http://www.hyperactivesw.com
On July 8, 2016 8:30:01 PM Sannyasin Brahmanathaswami <bra...@hindu.org> wrote:
Jacque wrote: "insert the script of the stack into front or back"
The dictionary implies that this can only be done with an "object" , hence
the assumption (probably wrong) that one needs to have the stack open…
I assume you mean that we can do it like this now with script only stacks
insert the script of stack (
[path-to-script-only-stacks]/api.livecodescript) into front
OK… we will try that.
BR
_______________________________________________
use-livecode mailing list
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your
subscription preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode
_______________________________________________
use-livecode mailing list
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode
