On July 2, 2016 10:54:44 AM Richard Gaskin <ambassa...@fourthworld.com> wrote:
Under what circumstances would someone prefer to set a script that can't be executed? However you handle this is fine by me; I'd say do whatever's easiest for you.
I don't much care either since any change won't affect how I work, though I do tend slightly towards Monte's suggestion. But I can think of a reason why some might prefer to set a script that won't compile. If you've been writing a very long script and haven't saved it yet, you may want to preserve what you have and debug it later. Perhaps it's quitting time, or your wife's gone into labor, or Armageddon is nigh and you're hoping to survive it.
Of course you could get around the problem by commenting out the entire script and setting that instead. So yeah, I don't see any down side to making the change. And it could well save more trouble than not.
Jacqueline Landman Gay | jac...@hyperactivesw.com HyperActive Software | http://www.hyperactivesw.com _______________________________________________ use-livecode mailing list use-livecode@lists.runrev.com Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode
