Very nice and clean example code.
Also, as you hinted, this does have the problem:
add 1 to item random(16) of myVar
I infer from this that the problem is very likely not in how 'any' counts
items.
This also applies to subtract and multiply. I suspect that random(16) is being
evaluated twice based on a first glance at the pattern. Because of that, my
guess is that this bug will not cause a crash.
The problem also occurs when I use my own random function.
it looks as though this...
add 1 to any item of x
... is being evaluated as...
put 1 + any item of x into any item of x
... which is incorrect.
Perhaps that is just the info needed for a quick fix.
This also will show up for any function with side effects built-in or not, so
this is a far ranging bug and it should be pushed up in priority.
Dar
> On Jun 5, 2016, at 8:48 AM, Mark Schonewille
> <m.schonewi...@economy-x-talk.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Quentin,
>
> I see the same results, when I try your code. However, if I first store the
> random value and add 1 to an item in the string in the next line in the
> script, it works correctly. Apparently, the random function and the add
> command are incompatible.
>
> on mouseUp
> put "0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0" into myVar
> repeat 100
> put random(16) into myRandom
> add 1 to item myRandom of myVar
> put myVar & cr after myTempList
> end repeat
> put sum(myVar) & cr & myTempList
> end mouseUp
>
> Kind regards,
>
> Mark Schonewille
> http://economy-x-talk.com
> https://www.facebook.com/marksch
>
> Buy the most extensive book on the
> LiveCode language:
> http://livecodebeginner.economy-x-talk.com
>
> Op 05-Jun-16 om 16:12 schreef Quentin Long:
>> Code which exhibits the bug:
>>
>> on mouseUp
>> put "0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0" into Fred
>> repeat 100 times
>> add 1 to any item of Fred
>> put Fred into line (1 + the number of lines in fld "testbed") of fld
>> "testbed"
>> end repeat
>> put sum (Fred) into line (1 + the number of lines in fld "testbed") of fld
>> "testbed"
>> end mouseUp
>>
>> This handler *should* end up generating a 16-item string of integers which
>> sum to exactly 100. What it *actually does* end up generating, is a 16-item
>> string of integers whose sum may or may not fall somewhere within the range
>> 80-120. Not sure what the hell is going on here, but I am not at all happy
>> about it. Perhaps other people might like to try this code on their systems,
>> and see if it works as intended for them?
>>
>> http://quality.livecode.com/show_bug.cgi?id=17795
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> use-livecode mailing list
> use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
> Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription
> preferences:
> http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode
_______________________________________________
use-livecode mailing list
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode
