@Richard. I like your benchmarking "soft spot" and I've learned both from your stacks and considerations, appreciating that until now. But you really could add a smiley if you *interpret* a 1/10000 second difference of timing ;-)
@Phil. The additional digits of the long seconds are probably closer to random than to exact measurement. Anyway, as the long seconds are 'produced' increasingly, they are good for ordering events in a queue. But they are NOT 'exact' for measuring the duration of an event, TMHO. Hermann p.s. I think we should prefer the median for averaging timing, or, even better, if the process measured is important, show the whole distribution of timing values (in categories/histogram). -- View this message in context: http://runtime-revolution.278305.n4.nabble.com/Missing-split-option-tp4704799p4704829.html Sent from the Revolution - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ use-livecode mailing list use-livecode@lists.runrev.com Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode
