> > R. Mathewson wrote: > > Although I would still like to know why it has been > > downgraded to a Plug-in.
> M. Wieder wrote: > Actually, I don't see that as a downgrade at all. Making > it a plugin allows it to be more malleable, fixable, > replaceable. Taking it out of the IDE hierarchy should > give us more options to work on the Application Browser. > Since the team wants to do other things, it's up to the > community to fix the AB, and making it a plugin makes it > easier to do so. Reading that one could wish, the LC 7 property inspector could become upgraded to a plugin too. And here in advance a tip for the handful of persons here who think that *everything* new is better (there are improvements, but also changes for the worse). == Just try both, the oldPI and the newPI, with small stacks and large stacks, then you don't need a listing of what is good and what should become better with the newPI. == And just try both, the AB and the new PB, with small stacks and large stacks, then you don't need a listing of what is good enough and what should become better with the PB. Hermann _______________________________________________ use-livecode mailing list use-livecode@lists.runrev.com Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode
