On 11/07/2015 12:17 PM, Monte Goulding wrote:
I had a look in the source and I don’t think it would be all that tricky to
upgrade send so you can send private handlers from the same object. Send
without a timer is easy as you already have a handle to the execution context
which gives you a handle to the calling object. Send in time is a little
tricker but not overly so. It just involves adding the calling object in a
number of calls and also to the internal pending messages data structure. I
guess we could add an extra caller object reference item to the pendingMessages
as a result. The engine uses the same mechanism to send a lot of messages so
you would need to handle the caller being nil meaning an engine message.
Very cool.
What file were you looking at? I'd love the be able to use private
callbacks for socket commands.
--
Mark Wieder
ahsoftw...@gmail.com
_______________________________________________
use-livecode mailing list
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode
