So if we had deleted the app browser stack from the build, would your point of view have changed and would you have started to use the project browser? ;)
Sent from my iPhone > On 7 Oct 2015, at 19:46, Richmond <richmondmathew...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> On 07/10/15 21:40, Mark Waddingham wrote: >> Indeed - but I don't think your tone of phrase was using it in that exact >> manner? ;) >> >> By the way, I'm smiling here - it is a useful conversation to have if it is >> constructive. Either app browser bashing or project browser bashing isn't >> particularly useful to my mind. > > I'm not Project Browser bashing as such. > > I was very surprised when the Project Browser arrived, and played with it > quite a bit, but reverted to the App Browser as could not > see any obvious advantages. > > As both Browsers are present in current LiveCode 8 builds I don't actually > see anything wrong with retaining both of them. > > The fact that the menu system in the revMenuBar stack does NOT allow access > to the App Browser does give out a signal which > is fairly blatant that the App Browser is not going to be with us much longer: > > it was this that precipitated my small hack to allow access to the App > Browser. > > R. > >> >> What is useful is getting the information about what the best approach is to >> the problem - which is all I was trying to promote :) >> >> Sent from my iPhone >> >>>> On 7 Oct 2015, at 19:34, Richmond <richmondmathew...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>> On 07/10/15 21:22, Mark Waddingham wrote: >>>>> On 2015-10-07 20:08, Richmond wrote: >>>>> Well, it seems that the "people" are speaking with one voice over here: >>>>> >>>>> http://forums.livecode.com/viewtopic.php?f=6&t=25503 >>>>> >>>>> So, as an experiment in participatory democracy, and whether >>>>> RunRev/LiveCode REALLY listen >>>>> to their installed customer base, Please go there and give your opinion. >>>> If by the 'people' you mean yourself, one other person and another who >>>> said he doesn't even use the application browser (and hasn't for years) ;) >>> Well, I may not know much, but I do know that 'people' is a collective >>> noun, so, had I just meant myself I would have used 'person'. >>> >>>> To be fair, whilst preference *might* be an interesting thing to gauge... >>>> Far more useful would be constructive criticism of both the Project >>>> Browser and the Application Browser. It does seem a little 'silly' to >>>> maintain two things which serve essentially the same purpose - so Ali's >>>> idea is perhaps the best way forward - what is it that is good and bad >>>> about both and is it possible to design something which everybody would be >>>> happy with? >>>> >>>> Warmest Regards, >>>> >>>> Mark. >>> R. >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> use-livecode mailing list >>> use-livecode@lists.runrev.com >>> Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your >>> subscription preferences: >>> http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode >> _______________________________________________ >> use-livecode mailing list >> use-livecode@lists.runrev.com >> Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription >> preferences: >> http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode > > > _______________________________________________ > use-livecode mailing list > use-livecode@lists.runrev.com > Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription > preferences: > http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode _______________________________________________ use-livecode mailing list use-livecode@lists.runrev.com Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode
