Improving lineOffset performance would be great, but just as a reminder, fixing 
the lineOffset bug first would be ideal:

http://quality.runrev.com/show_bug.cgi?id=15512 
<http://quality.runrev.com/show_bug.cgi?id=15512>

Eric

> On Sep 18, 2015, at 2:38 PM, Richard Gaskin <ambassa...@fourthworld.com> 
> wrote:
> 
> Mark Waddingham wrote:
> > I'm slightly surprised lineOffset would generally be 10 times slower
> > though - do you have code that demonstrates that?
> 
> Thankfully not in the latest v7 build, 7.1rc3.  I'll see if I can get some 
> time later to dig up the old version where I'd seen that, but at this point 
> it may not matter since v7 is only two to three times slower than v6, nowhere 
> near as slow as seen previously for lineoffset.
> 
> -- 
> Richard Gaskin
> Fourth World Systems
> Software Design and Development for the Desktop, Mobile, and the Web
> ____________________________________________________________________
> ambassa...@fourthworld.com                http://www.FourthWorld.com
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> use-livecode mailing list
> use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
> Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
> preferences:
> http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode

_______________________________________________
use-livecode mailing list
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode

Reply via email to