Improving lineOffset performance would be great, but just as a reminder, fixing the lineOffset bug first would be ideal:
http://quality.runrev.com/show_bug.cgi?id=15512 <http://quality.runrev.com/show_bug.cgi?id=15512> Eric > On Sep 18, 2015, at 2:38 PM, Richard Gaskin <ambassa...@fourthworld.com> > wrote: > > Mark Waddingham wrote: > > I'm slightly surprised lineOffset would generally be 10 times slower > > though - do you have code that demonstrates that? > > Thankfully not in the latest v7 build, 7.1rc3. I'll see if I can get some > time later to dig up the old version where I'd seen that, but at this point > it may not matter since v7 is only two to three times slower than v6, nowhere > near as slow as seen previously for lineoffset. > > -- > Richard Gaskin > Fourth World Systems > Software Design and Development for the Desktop, Mobile, and the Web > ____________________________________________________________________ > ambassa...@fourthworld.com http://www.FourthWorld.com > > > _______________________________________________ > use-livecode mailing list > use-livecode@lists.runrev.com > Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription > preferences: > http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode _______________________________________________ use-livecode mailing list use-livecode@lists.runrev.com Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode