> On 14 Aug 2015, at 2:43 pm, Mark Wieder <mwie...@ahsoftware.net> wrote: > > I'm just saying that if the team is working on this now or plans to in the > future while lcVCS development is going on then it's a wasted effort. I'm not > saying that the team needs to telegraph their intentions every step of the > way (although it would be nice to avoid BAF-style surprises), but I'm not the > only one who's put a lot of work into projects that have been torpedoed by > new items coming from the mothership that we didn't expect. However, I don't > think the team takes user-level version control seriously enough to warrant > this being a real problem.
I get the feeling that the team is hoping that someone comes up with a better idea than the complicated file formats that peter and I came up with and are prepared to wait for that. I think the platform would need to change drastically for anything that appeared clean on GitHub to work. BTW I just realised there’s absolutely nothing stopping us integrating an entire pull request and change review system into the IDE rather than use a web app for that it would probably make more sense to keep it in the IDE. GitHub API can manage pull requests so I assume bitbucket, gitlab etc apis can do so also. _______________________________________________ use-livecode mailing list use-livecode@lists.runrev.com Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode
