"But if there's anything in recent discussions on which there's anything close to unanimity, whether from ol' timers or newcomers, whether from open source developers or proprietary entrepreneurs, it's that maintaining feature parity between Community and Commercial as close as practical is important for everyone.” (from Richard)
Agreed wholeheartedly!. Bill > On Aug 12, 2015, at 2:49 PM, Monte Goulding <mo...@sweattechnologies.com> > wrote: > > >> 1. Why hasn't this been more widely promoted? > > It's only been promoted on the lists, forums and Facebook. For a while RunRev > were going to buy it, then they decided to do their own so I stopped pushing > ahead with lcVCS as it appeared to be a waste of time. Now this and maybe > it's back in the game.. Not sure yet. >> >> 2. Why hasn't it been submitted to the only resource-sharing tool we have >> built into the IDE? > > I'm not sure I've ever looked in there... Is it worthwhile? > > Before you get excited lcVCS doesn't support LC 8 yet because I'd need to > depend on IDE code to do it at the moment and that seems risky. That and > there appeared to be no point working on it until today... > > > _______________________________________________ > use-livecode mailing list > use-livecode@lists.runrev.com > Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription > preferences: > http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode _______________________________________________ use-livecode mailing list use-livecode@lists.runrev.com Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode
