On 18/07/15 09:48, David Bovill wrote:
Now that make no sense :)
It does seem odd that that would be better than SET THE VIS or HIDE / SHOW.
Richmond.
On 17 July 2015 at 19:17, Roger Eller <roger.e.el...@sealedair.com> wrote:
I have also found that toggling the blendLevel from 100 to 0 is very quick
and efficient, compared to hide/show.
~Roger
On Fri, Jul 17, 2015 at 1:50 PM, Scott Rossi <sc...@tactilemedia.com>
wrote:
In addition to the wait(/send?) options proposed, you might consider
displaying your animation more efficiently. Showing an image and hiding
another requires two steps and is inefficient. You can use a transparent
button to display your "frames" by setting the icon property of the
button
to the ID of each of your images in succession, without having to hide
any
image. Plus it's much easier to move the animation around the card since
you only need to move the button and don't need to concern yourself with
the locations of the images.
Regards,
Scott Rossi
Creative Director
Tactile Media UX/UI Design
_______________________________________________
use-livecode mailing list
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your
subscription preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode
_______________________________________________
use-livecode mailing list
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode
_______________________________________________
use-livecode mailing list
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode
