On Jul 8, 2015, at 11:58 AM, Richard Gaskin <ambassa...@fourthworld.com> wrote:
> Replacing a single character should ideally only affect the text style for > that character, even if it occurs in multiple places, so personally I would > consider the second example a bug if it strips all styles from unaffected > portions of the text. This comment appears in the dictionary entry for replace: "Important! You can use the replace command on a field, but doing so removes any formatting (fonts, styles, colors, and sizes) in the field. To work around this limitation, use the field's htmlText property as the source for replacement instead of using the field itself as the source.” So it’s intentional. I suspect that speed is the issue here. Replace is dang fast, and I wouldn’t want it to be slowed down by forcing it to consider formatting. Especially when there are simple workarounds like the htmlText trick above or using replaceText(). Devin Devin Asay Office of Digital Humanities Brigham Young University _______________________________________________ use-livecode mailing list use-livecode@lists.runrev.com Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode
