On Mon, Jul 6, 2015 at 2:15 PM, Bob Sneidar <bobsnei...@iotecdigital.com> wrote:
> I went back to the dictionary and read more thoroughly what wait for > messages does, and while it is working as advertised, it is fairly > worthless in it’s present form unless you find a way to trap for *ALL* > messages and only respond to the callback, which is way more involved than > it ought to be. > I have ended up with a "wait 0 for messages". It allows things to happen, without waiting for them.. -- Dr. Richard E. Hawkins, Esq. (702) 508-8462 _______________________________________________ use-livecode mailing list use-livecode@lists.runrev.com Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode
