I don't know why not, Richard. I was only replying to the OP with the last thing I heard about LC>html5, and that was way back when the crowd-funding campaign ended. It sounded like it was going to be limited, but that was very early in the planning phase. If there is now a way, then that is terrific!
~Roger On Apr 5, 2015 11:30 AM, "Richard Gaskin" <ambassa...@fourthworld.com> wrote: > Roger Eller wrote: > > > vOn Apr 5, 2015 7:42 AM, "David Bovill" wrote: > > > >> Anyone have any thoughts on how an HTML5+Javascript exported Livecode > >> application would / could interface with the rest of the Javascript > >> world? > > > > I'm not sure if it will even be possible; it was certainly never their > > intent. > > Why not? > > RevBrowser lets us integrate with JS; why not provide ways of letting JS > integrate with LC inside the browser? > > It would seem horribly limited if everything LC/HTML delivered were > effectively self-jailed, but I'd wager that's not the plan. On the desktop > we have support for file I/O, AppleScript, Win Registry, shell, and many > other means of communicating with the host system. I can't imagine we'd > have anything less when the host system is a browser, and that would mean > bi-directional JS. > > -- > Richard Gaskin > Fourth World Systems > Software Design and Development for Desktop, Mobile, and Web > ____________________________________________________________ > ambassa...@fourthworld.com http://www.FourthWorld.com > > _______________________________________________ > use-livecode mailing list > use-livecode@lists.runrev.com > Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your > subscription preferences: > http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode > _______________________________________________ use-livecode mailing list use-livecode@lists.runrev.com Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode
