Just to be awkward (for a change . . . no irony intended), if 6.7.4 is built so that it will run on Windows XP [ a system released in 2001 ] why is it not built so that it can run on Mac OS 10.4 PPC [ a system released in 2005 ], or, for that matter, Mac OS 10.4 Intel?

It is, also, interesting to note that the first alpha build of LC 8 is also capable of running on Windows XP.

The reply will, inevitably, consist of stuff about market share . . . which is probably due to a bad
case of not thinking one's way through a load of statistics.

The rationale behind dropping support for an out-dated operating system, surely, should not be based on the global installed base of that operating system, but the globally installed base of that operating system who use LiveCode for software development, and the clients to whom
they sell/give their standalones for deployment.

------------------

I have no particular beef with Windows XP [in fact, if truth be known, I have a dual boot machine that runs Win XP and Win 7 - on two 40 Gig Hard drives] for software testing.

I do have big beefs with Windows 95, 98, Millennium and Vista . . . but I think quite a lot of other
people do as well.

------------------

This posting is NOT to try to pursuade RunRev to dig out all their PPC code and spend donkey's ages compiling PPC builds while softly chanting "bloody, bloody Richmond" sotto voce.

It IS, again, again, again, a request to make available these:

1. The last version of RR/LC to run and/or build Mac OS 9 standalones.

2. The last version of RR/LC to run and/or build Mac OS X PPC standalones on Mac OS 10.4.

either for free or for a modest fee, with some legal disclaimer that paraphrases as
"you're on your own, mate".

-------------------

Richmond.

_______________________________________________
use-livecode mailing list
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode

Reply via email to