> Am 18.03.2015 um 12:16 schrieb Colin Holgate <colinholg...@gmail.com>: > > I would do a mixed approach. Get your client to join at $99 per year, and to > have you as a team member. They would include at least one of your devices in > their list, so you can test installs, and you would be able to build for up > to 100 devices. If they only need about 10, that would cover quite a few > employee and device changes. > And if i remember right every year you can reset that list of devices. This would allow you to delete non active devices and it increases the number of possible test devices again.
> >> On Mar 18, 2015, at 6:23 AM, Mark Wilcox <m...@sorcery-ltd.co.uk> wrote: >> >> I've used Ad Hoc Distribution for this a few times before - it can become a >> bit of a pain because employees join and people get new devices - you have >> to manage updates to the provisioning profile manually - more often than >> you'd think. >> >> >> A better option is if you can get the client to join the iOS Developer >> Enterprise Program: >> >> https://developer.apple.com/programs/ios/enterprise/ >> >> >> It's $299/year but then you can get Enterprise distribution profiles/ >> certificates. These don't have any device restrictions at all, it's just >> part of Apple's rules that they're only allowed for internal use within an >> Enterprise. This removes all the issues with collecting UDIDs and keeping >> provisioning profiles updated. >> >> >> -- >> >> Mark Wilcox >> >> m...@sorcery-ltd.co.uk >> >> >> On Wed, Mar 18, 2015, at 06:36 AM, j...@souslelogo.com wrote: >> >>> Hi list >>> One of my clients needs an app for his employees that will run >>> on their iphones or itabs. Those employees are very few (less than >>> 10) and no one else will be interested in the app because it's >>> related to a very specific activity, therefore using iTunes doesn't >>> seem relevant. >>> I took a look at Apple's distribution options, and the "Ad Hoc >>> Distribution" looks like the way to go, but I was wondering if >>> anyone had already use it, or if there was any better option... >>> >>> Thanks in advance >>> jbv >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> use-livecode mailing list >>> use-livecode@lists.runrev.com >>> Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your >>> subscription preferences: >>> http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode >> >> _______________________________________________ >> use-livecode mailing list >> use-livecode@lists.runrev.com >> Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription >> preferences: >> http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode > > > _______________________________________________ > use-livecode mailing list > use-livecode@lists.runrev.com > Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription > preferences: > http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode _______________________________________________ use-livecode mailing list use-livecode@lists.runrev.com Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode
