Dave- Monday, February 9, 2015, 2:47:12 PM, you wrote:
> In this case, I dont think theres an advantage in "repeat for > each" as were iterating through array elements and not chunks. > Are you really seeing it work faster? > I was using a 24519-line list of 555Kb. (tried to reply earlier but gmane had other ideas) I'm using a 20000-line test. I was originally seeing my adaptation run slightly faster, but on retesting I see it's slightly slower (but still seems running neck and neck). At any rate, never mind - there doesn't seem to be a speed advantage to the "repeat for each" construct here, as you mentioned. -- -Mark Wieder ahsoftw...@gmail.com This communication may be unlawfully collected and stored by the National Security Agency (NSA) in secret. The parties to this email do not consent to the retrieving or storing of this communication and any related metadata, as well as printing, copying, re-transmitting, disseminating, or otherwise using it. If you believe you have received this communication in error, please delete it immediately. _______________________________________________ use-livecode mailing list use-livecode@lists.runrev.com Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode
