Monte Goulding wrote: > Well... I could be wrong but I expect that we will get widgets (a way > to create new object types) and then more general extensions to > declare command syntax but I'm not expecting to be able to add a > property to an existing object. As I said I could be wrong...
I don't know if v8's Open Language will allow the addition of new properties (would be nice), but in this case I think we're safe since the request here is arguably more of a function than a property.
After all, the owner of an object isn't something intrinsic to an object, but merely incidental to where it happens to be placed at the moment.
Given this, Geoff's function seems like a good solution. Whether it's written in fancy v8 syntax or the syntax we have doesn't matter much to me personally; it gets the job done.
-- Richard Gaskin Fourth World Systems Software Design and Development for the Desktop, Mobile, and the Web ____________________________________________________________________ ambassa...@fourthworld.com http://www.FourthWorld.com _______________________________________________ use-livecode mailing list use-livecode@lists.runrev.com Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode
