On Oct 26, 2014, at 11:06 AM, Richard Gaskin wrote: > Jacques Hausser wrote: > > >> Le 26 oct. 2014 à 03:27, Kay C Lan a écrit : > > > >> Again, I FULLY SUPPORT Richard's recommendation that if anyone > >> notices any errors or even believes there should be better examples, > >> Notes, Tips or inclusions in the Dictionary and User Guide, then > >> PLEASE submit them to: > >> > >> http://quality.runrev.com/ > >> > >> Whilst they may not appear in the next cycle, I do appreciate that an > >> improved Dictionary is being worked on, and like LC itself, that has > >> come forward leaps and bounds in the last year, I'm sure all the > >> corrections the Community adds to the Bug DB in relation to the > >> Dictionary will eventually come back to us in the form of much > >> better documentation. > >> > >> After entry in the Bug DB, a quick post to this List giving everyone > >> here a heads up of what you've found would also be much appreciated. > > > > I fully agree. The dictionary is very important to shape the first > > impression of newcomers about LC. I have read and heard several > > disparaging comments about the documentation which are a very > > negative publicity for this fantastic product. I perfectly understand > > that it is far more interesting and stimulating for the small staff > > in Edinburgh to develop new features - and they are brilliant at that > > - than devote time and energy to do the house cleaning on the > > documentation. But it's a vital part of how their work is appreciated > > outside. I would suggest Kevin to establish a weekly "hour of > > dictionary cleaning" for everybody. Most of the dictionary problems > > could be solved in such a short time. > > Well said from both of you. Hopefully we can channel some of the energy into > useful outcomes. After all, it takes about as much time to submit a bug > report as it does to make a post about a bug to a user-to-user venue, but > with a bug report it gets queued for action. > > I'd like to see if we could put together a Community Documentation Team to > help with some of the manual steps of applying those bug reports to the > Dictionary entries themselves. > > I'll be discussing this with Ben in our next Community meeting on Thursday. > > If any of you are in a position to help with such an effort, please drop me a > note at the address below and we'll set you up with whatever tools we come up > with to make that happen.
One possible solution would be to build into the the native LC dictionary a userNotes feature, allowing the user to add comments or examples saved locally for her/his own reference, and within that feature allowing submission of a particular note to the community documentation team for curating for inclusion as a shared note for all users. Best of both worlds, AFAICS. -- Peter Peter M. Brigham pmb...@gmail.com http://home.comcast.net/~pmbrig _______________________________________________ use-livecode mailing list use-livecode@lists.runrev.com Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode