I don't know about benchmark on routines, but I have created a
measly 10MB file -- customer database -- and saving changes to
the file takes a full 10 seconds or more. That seems pretty slow
to me. Duplicating the file in Finder takes a fraction of a
second. Saving an edited 10MB .wav audio file takes a fraction of
a second.
Why is saving the stack so slow? This is going to be a real pain
for my data entry lady who is used to HC saving everything
automatically and invisibly....
OSX, MacBook Pro i7, 1TB internal HD.
Tim Selander
Tokyo, Japan
On 10/27/14, 10:44 PM, Geoff Canyon wrote:
I'm wondering if anyone has benchmarked 7.0 performance? I did two quick
tests and found:
on mouseUp
put the long seconds into T
repeat with i = 1 to 20000000
put "A" && "aa" into X
end repeat
put the long seconds - T
end mouseUp
Took almost 5x as long to run as on 6.7, which I expected since it's
presumably doing UTF things under the hood.
But I also found:
on mouseUp
put the long seconds into T
repeat with i = 1 to 20000000
end repeat
put the long seconds - T
end mouseUp
Took about 1.5x as long to run on 7.0 as on 6.7. Obviously our own code is
still a much larger factor -- "repeat for each" in 7.0 is still going to
handily beat "repeat with" in 6.7 for processing large chunks of text, etc.
gc
_______________________________________________
use-livecode mailing list
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode
_______________________________________________
use-livecode mailing list
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode
