On 21.05.2014 at 18:31 Uhr +0000 Bob Sneidar apparently wrote:
Okay well that is making a little more sense. So if I put an on idle
handler in all my stacks and then pass the message, it should filter
down to my mainstack. I suppose I could insert the
stack-closing-code in all my substacks, but that makes me feel dirty
somehow. ;-)
Bob S
Idle is not the way to go IMHO. Try the flight recorder to see what
is really going on. From a design point of view, a strategy to handle
opening and closing work stacks (substacks) from a script in the
mainstack should work. However, the substacks must have the
destroystack property set and do not have any messages in the pending
queue among others. Have you checked frontscripts?
RObert
_______________________________________________
use-livecode mailing list
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode
