On 05/05/14 16:39, Charles E Buchwald wrote:
There are DropTools, PowerTools, tmControl, MobGUI, and some others which I'm
sure I'm forgetting, so I daresay it's an idea that's been attempted a few
times.
I like very much the idea of "a LEGO kit" for, let's say, casual or beginning
programmers. I've known many designers who dabble in programming who would find such a
thing very useful for prototyping UI/UX. The few times I've shown LIveCode to kids, the
drag-and-drop stuff is a nice place to start.
I think the users who are most likely to really get into that LEGO kit are
likely to do so with the Community version. What's the possibility of a
community effort towards defining a standard, or some kind of interoperability,
for LEGO-like components?
- Charles
There is no earthly reason why a LEGO kit cannot be designed as an
alternative
GUI/front-end to float on Livecode: and I'm sure there would be quite a
demand for it were
one designed.
There are other possibilities to. Here's one of them :
https://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/RRRThesis/info
this is a prototype agent-led interface for Livecode that guides
teachers and so on through a decision
tree system to make stacks for content delivery and reinforcement.
The code is "up for grabs" if anyone can leverage it and go further with it.
Richmond.
_______________________________________________
use-livecode mailing list
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode
