I do not see this as a bug. Is it possible that there is some HTML convention that requires some kind of tag/ending tag to be present for a page to be considered an html page? And I agree with Richmond that if a field is empty, there is NO POSSIBLE WAY for the HTML Text of the field to be anything other than <p></p>, so I am struggling to see when this would present an impassible problem.
Bob On Mar 19, 2014, at 07:18 , J. Landman Gay <jac...@hyperactivesw.com> wrote: > To me it looks like the engine wraps the html in opening and closing tags, > and when there is no content it forgets to take them off. I think the > logical concept of empty outweighs the technical meaning of the html and it's > a bug. > > On March 19, 2014 9:02:28 AM CDT, Tim Bleiler <blei...@buffalo.edu> wrote: >> >> On Mar 19, 2014, at 9:39 AM, Klaus major-k wrote: > >> >> It does create an odd condition by Livecode standards however that you >> can set the htmlText to empty, then immediately test if the htmlText is >> empty and it returns false. I suspect that could confuse some people. >> > > > -- > Jacqueline Landman Gay | jac...@hyperactivesw.com > HyperActive Software | http://www.hyperactivesw.com > > _______________________________________________ > use-livecode mailing list > use-livecode@lists.runrev.com > Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription > preferences: > http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode _______________________________________________ use-livecode mailing list use-livecode@lists.runrev.com Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode
