On Tue, Mar 11, 2014 at 9:34 AM, Peter Haworth <p...@lcsql.com> wrote:
> In general, it's risky accessing SQlite databases over a network unless you > are only querying the database and not doing any insert/update/delete > operations for the reasons explained in the link. > How about sharing a :memory: instance between two apps of the same user and machine. This would go a long way on my master/slave issue of syncing to a remote database without locking up the user interface . . . (at the moment, I watch for time since last keystroke, and if it's long enough, risk the update. I'm thinking to pass the UPDATE/SELECT command to to a slave process, but having the slave access the internal db would be better . . .). -- Dr. Richard E. Hawkins, Esq. (702) 508-8462 _______________________________________________ use-livecode mailing list use-livecode@lists.runrev.com Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode
