Hi Mike,
In that case, sockets are indeed not the right approach. It should be
possible to use a standalone as a command line utility, with parameters
as I explained before.
Hiding the LiveCode interface would seem more elegant to me. Maybe you
can still use -u to hide the user interface altogether. You could also
set the visible of your stacks to false.
--
Best regards,
Mark Schonewille
Economy-x-Talk Consulting and Software Engineering
Homepage: http://economy-x-talk.com
Twitter: http://twitter.com/xtalkprogrammer
KvK: 50277553
Use Color Converter to convert CMYK, RGB, RAL, XYZ, H.Lab and other
colour spaces. http://www.color-converter.com
Buy my new book "Programming LiveCode for the Real Beginner"
http://qery.us/3fi
Fill out this survey please
http://livecodebeginner.economy-x-talk.com/survey/
On 8/22/2013 03:57, Mike Kerner wrote:
And Mark S., sorry, I wasn't ignoring you, I just didn't see your message.
I have a system that's written in 4D that needs some functionality added to
it. The code to do that is already written in LC. Converting it would
work, but why bother, when I can just create a standalone in LC that I call
from 4D?
_______________________________________________
use-livecode mailing list
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode
