That's weird. I still get the 16th. Can anyone else confirm the 15th? (not doubting you Dar)
I might have to change this then… Tom -- Tom McGrath III http://lazyriver.on-rev.com mcgra...@mac.com On Jul 18, 2013, at 12:39 AM, Dar Scott <d...@swcp.com> wrote: > > On Jul 17, 2013, at 7:03 PM, Thomas McGrath III wrote: > >> I am converting the short date (08/16/13) to seconds and I get 1376625600 > > When I converted it back earlier today, I got the 15th. I guess there is a > problem related to timezones or something. > > Consider NAMEyyyymmdd. It is easy to parse. It lists in order. It is > somewhat readable. It is two characters shorter. > > Dar > > _______________________________________________ > use-livecode mailing list > use-livecode@lists.runrev.com > Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription > preferences: > http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode _______________________________________________ use-livecode mailing list use-livecode@lists.runrev.com Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode
