On 30/06/2013, at 9:07 AM, "Dr. Hawkins" <[email protected]> wrote:
>> It could be that commercial server is not yet integrated into the automated >> build process... >> could be a lower priority because 99.99% of server use cases will be covered >> by community... > > If I have to re-write in php (or whatever) to make a web version (open > source of the product is just plain not an option, for reason I've > discussed in the past), it's not much of a step to flat-out compile in > another language while I'm at it for the desktop. > > The server version being "second class" will be a deal-stopper for > commercial use . . . http://www.php.net/license/3_01.txt Not sure what the license is for (whatever) but PHP is FOSS... BTW I didn't say they weren't going to do a commercial version of the server... just that it might reasonably be seen as a low priority. LiveCode hasn't got a massive user base... the percentage of users using server is small... the percentage that really need commercial server would be only a handful. The percentage of those that can't continue to use the last available commercial version given there's really no features added? are there any? Cheer -- Monte Goulding M E R Goulding - software development services mergExt - There's an external for that! _______________________________________________ use-livecode mailing list [email protected] Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode
