I'm not mad about it either, not surprising since I've never been that keen on the "templatexxxx" syntax either. It was just a suggestion aimed at some sort of compatibility with existing syntax
I've now got my browser hooked into the RSS feed for the forums, which removes one of my issues with using the forum. It looks like the propertynames issue is being lumped together with the properties changes but there should be a separate thread for it. Don't have time to start one right now, but I'll try to do it over the weekend. Pete lcSQL Software <http://www.lcsql.com> On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 4:06 PM, Monte Goulding <mo...@sweattechnologies.com > wrote: > > On 15/06/2013, at 8:43 AM, Peter Haworth <p...@lcsql.com> wrote: > > > Another idea i had on this was something similar to the "templatexxxx" we > > have now, so "the propertynamesStack", "the propertyNamesButton", etc. I > > know nothing about the engine but would that make it any more feasible? > > I don't personally like that syntax but you might want to discuss this on > the engine forum to see what the important people think... > > -- > Monte Goulding > > M E R Goulding - software development services > mergExt - There's an external for that! > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > use-livecode mailing list > use-livecode@lists.runrev.com > Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your > subscription preferences: > http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode > _______________________________________________ use-livecode mailing list use-livecode@lists.runrev.com Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode
