Hi Richmond,
Open the standalone in a text editor and copy the scripts,
particularlythe license checking routines. Then use those scripts to
create your own key. I think that's enough difference.
--
Best regards,
Mark Schonewille
Economy-x-Talk Consulting and Software Engineering
Homepage: http://economy-x-talk.com
Twitter: http://twitter.com/xtalkprogrammer
KvK: 50277553
Use Color Converter to convert CMYK, RGB, RAL, XYZ, H.Lab and other
colour spaces. http://www.color-converter.com
Buy my new book "Programming LiveCode for the Real Beginner"
http://qery.us/3fi
On 5/21/2013 17:10, Richmond wrote:
So, I made a stack containing 1 button containing the script:
on mouseUp
put "Wotcha"
end mouseUp
then made Linux, Mac and Windows standalones using LC 4.5 with a password
protecting the stack.
then made Linux, Mac and Windows standalones using LC 6.0.1 OSS (with NO
password protection).
this all done on a box running Ubuntu 12.04.
The standalones for each OS from the 2 LC versions look functionally the
same.
What I want to do is learn how I can "crack" the non-password protected
standalones
so that I am actually convinced there is a REAL difference between them
and those
that, supposedly, contain password protected stacks.
Even the Macintosh standalone, which is not a monolithic file but a
series of nested directories and folders,
does not have anything obviously different in either of the standalones,
nor anything that looks like a
raw stack.
Richmond.
_______________________________________________
use-livecode mailing list
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode
