On May 1, 2013, at 4:25 PM, Richard Gaskin wrote:

> In terms of capabilities, nothing's changed.
> 
> But yes, the pricing for the Commercial Edition has changed.
> 
> Most developers were coding for multiple platforms, and by the time you add 
> up all the platforms from their formerly-complex pricing structure it wound 
> up that most of us were paying far more than $500 every year, while a 
> relative few who developed for single platforms were paying less.

I'm not a developer. Is the LC business model is moving away from DIY users 
like me? I started out as a HyperCard retread, never really matured beyond that.

> 
> So in your case, I can understand why you would prefer the old pricing 
> structure.
> 
> But if you're developing a commercial app, is $500 truly prohibitive to have 
> an engine as capable as LiveCode doing so much of the work?

If one is developing a commercial app, $500 may not be truly prohibitive. I 
wouldn't know. (I did once try to write a commercial app in Basic on my Atari, 
possibly a 1200XL. Didn't work out...)

> As Monte pointed out, the encrypt and decrypt functions can be used to 
> protect data, and much more securely than the method used for stack 
> protection.

Gotta confess, I know nothing about the encrypt and decrypt functions. Never 
heard of them. Maybe I can get them to work -- will look them up.

Or maybe I'll just use FileVault. I always planned to learn how to use 
FileVault, never got around to it. When I send or save the stacks on the cloud, 
I can encrypt the stacks some other way. I need security beyond the startup 
password, in case of loss or theft of computer, etc.

Thanks, Richard.

TM
_______________________________________________
use-livecode mailing list
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode

Reply via email to