On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 8:55 AM, Monte Goulding <mo...@sweattechnologies.com > wrote:
> Yes there is so you might want to take screenshots of where it says the > wrong thing and bug report them. > > Can you please explain this further, I'm now (again) confused. I was under the impression that a Commercial version of LC is the Community Edition of LC + the ability to password protect stacks. There is nothing in Community that is not in Commercial. Why would anyone with a Commercial license for LC want to work inside the Community Edition. Yes I can appreciate you might want to give a daughter, friend or colleague a copy of LC, so it will be the Community Edition, but when it is you and your work, why would you bother with the Community Edition? Also, if I understand the registration authentication process, when you start LC up, it phones home, checks your status, and in Skip's case I'd say the response is correct, it states you are a Commercial license holder. This does not prevent you from releasing OSS, just like the Community Edition. You just have the choice. I'm saying this from a Productive User's point of view, not from the aspect of whether I can delve into the Engine source code and fork off my own version of LC suitable to run of Mac OS 7.6.1 on Motorola 68030 chips. In this case, register with GitHub, download the source files, crack open Metrowerks CodeWarrior and have at it. But again, my understanding is, that if you did this, and your work met with Runrev standards, such changes would be Incorporated both into the Community and Commercial editions of LC. Or am I again, wrong. _______________________________________________ use-livecode mailing list use-livecode@lists.runrev.com Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode
