What's obvious about March and schedules? Is this just one of those things we're 'supposed to know', like how to pronounce Edinburgh properly?
On Sun, Mar 10, 2013 at 11:21 AM, Richmond <richmondmathew...@gmail.com>wrote: > On 03/10/2013 07:31 PM, Ian Wood wrote: > >> 'Once we get through that planning we'll be working away to bring you the >> "as is" open source release of the platform. We promised March for that and >> for anyone unfamiliar with software schedules, that means the end of March.' >> > > Oo, a bit sn*tty methinks. > > As someone familiar with software schedules I am well aware that a very > large proportion of them miss "the end of March", > unforeseen factors slowing things down. > > That, of itself, is not a source of worry, what is is that that one of the > ways of keeping the punters happy is by constantly drip-feeding > them gobbets of information so that they feel they are not being excluded > from the development process. > > > >> http://blog.runrev.com/blog/**bid/272739/We-Kickstarted-**LiveCode<http://blog.runrev.com/blog/bid/272739/We-Kickstarted-LiveCode> >> >> Ian >> >> On 10 Mar 2013, at 12:43, Richmond wrote: >> >> The plan was for the "as is" version of Open Source Livecode to >>> be released at the end of March . . . >>> >>> . . . wondering if anyone can confirm this as have plans that are >>> dependent on the release date. >>> >>> Richmond. >>> >> Stephen Barncard San Francisco Ca. USA more about sqb <http://www.google.com/profiles/sbarncar> _______________________________________________ use-livecode mailing list use-livecode@lists.runrev.com Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode
