On 04/03/2013, at 2:55 PM, Mark Wieder wrote: >> I don't think so... It's documented as a keyword not a function. > > OK. That stopped me in my tracks. In that case, the syntax is weirder > than I previously thought. It *should* IMO be documented as a > function, but I see all the way back to the 2.0 documentation that > it's written up as a "keyword". As Richard points out, that puts it in > the same category as "long" and "onto" and "expanded" and "ticks", > i.e., the set of all things that are not members of any sets.
As may be inferred from my answer to Richard's post I think it would be better to document these as adjective, preposition, adjective, noun rather than just keyword. Cheers -- M E R Goulding Software development services Bespoke application development for vertical markets mergExt - There's an external for that! _______________________________________________ use-livecode mailing list use-livecode@lists.runrev.com Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode
