Yes I agree, I don't see how RunRev will get any reward for having a server version - and if they don't get any reward for it then it may be less likely to be developed on an on-going basis.
I use TextMate to write code and upload to a server (whether I use revigniter or not) - I'm not building a standalone or even uploading a stack - so as far as I can see it will make no difference whether I use the commercial or GPL version. If I create and upload some stacks I guess I'll still be OK with the GPL version as I'm not building a standalone? If I build a standalone and upload that only then will need a commercial licence (unless I also make source code available) Or maybe RunRev are happy to have the server version as a loss-leader? Dave Ah good to know - my bad. Doesn't immediately strike me as in your interests - though I can see some companies demanding this - still why you don't simply require them to pay up for a commercial license on the server like seems at odds with the overall strategy, and less likely to promote open code on the server side? -- View this message in context: http://runtime-revolution.278305.n4.nabble.com/Open-source-LC-server-and-revigniter-tp4660146p4660180.html Sent from the Revolution - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ use-livecode mailing list use-livecode@lists.runrev.com Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode
