Hi Peter,

It is open source and therefore the author doesn't need to be compensated and yes RunRev has access to that code. If RunRev decides to use the new code, they have to provide the new engine as open source, which you might consider a form of compensation for everyone who has contributed any code.

--
Best regards,

Mark Schonewille

Economy-x-Talk Consulting and Software Engineering
Homepage: http://economy-x-talk.com
Twitter: http://twitter.com/xtalkprogrammer
KvK: 50277553

Use Color Converter to convert CMYK, RGB, RAL, XYZ, H.Lab and other colour 
spaces. http://www.color-converter.com

We have time for new software development projects. Contact me for a quote.

On 14 January, we suffered severe server problems. If you tried to send an 
e-mail between 13 and 18 January and didn't get a reply, please try again.

On 2/1/2013 19:42, Peter Haworth wrote:
Apologies if this has already been discussed but I have a licensing question

Fast forward a few months, the code base is open source and the free
version of LC is available.  Someone adds a feature to to the open source
(not me, I have no C++ knowledge).  People using the free
version obviously have access to it.

Does RunRev have access to the code for that feature to include in the
commercial version of Livecode?  If so, do they have an obligation to
compensate the original author of the code?

Pete
lcSQL Software <http://www.lcsql.com>


_______________________________________________
use-livecode mailing list
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode

Reply via email to