Not sure what the effect of locking messages would be in the middle of a closeStack. Stack might not close. I seriously doubt however, that your own scripting is taking 4 seconds to run during closeStack! If they are, then perhaps it's time to review the code to see if there is a more efficient way to go about it. Again, without seeing the actual stack(s) it's hard to offer anything more substantial.
Bob On Oct 5, 2012, at 1:55 PM, Dr. Hawkins wrote: > On Fri, Oct 5, 2012 at 1:51 PM, Bob Sneidar <b...@twft.com> wrote: >> There is the shutDownRequest if you are quitting a compiled app. It gets >> sent to the current card of the main stack! >> Make sure you are trapping for it in the mainStack and not another. Be sure >> to pass it in order to complete the shutdown! >> My understanding is that if you don't the SIGTERM sent to the app will be >> ignored. > > It's not the main stack; this is a substack. But in Mac, it gets it's > own close window from the OS. > > I just need this substack to close without executing any handlers. > > thanks _______________________________________________ use-livecode mailing list use-livecode@lists.runrev.com Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode
