I can see in this specific case that it would be problematic for Apple to make 
their OS backwards compatible with everything ever produced by them. There has 
to be some kind of cutoff. I don't fault them for that. Where they draw the 
line is really not an issue of legality, but of expedience. 

If Apple wrote the OS installers in such away that it would only work with 
hardware made in the last year, it would not be very expedient for them, as not 
very many people would or could use it. That it is written in such a way that 
intel based machines that are not that old but still cannot run it has many 
people, myself included raising our eyebrows already. But if we found a way to 
install it anyway and did so, we would not be legally bound to remove it. At 
least I do not think that is what minimum requirements mean. It only means that 
Apple would not be bound to support that configuration. 

I find in many of these posts that there seems to be a confusion between an 
action that voids a contractual obligation, and one that infringes on the 
rights of the producer in a manner that can at least theoretically be 
actionable. I think this thread is really about the latter, not the former. 

Bob


On Sep 10, 2012, at 7:38 PM, Kay C Lan wrote:

>> You're right, yes I'm referring to the parts about running only on Apple
>> hardware.
>> Pete
>> 
> 
> What you are saying then is Apple can't even say there is minimum system
> requirement for their OS.
> 
> There are many people who are very unhappy with Apple because they have a
> relatively modern Apple hardware yet Mount Lion doesn't run on it. This
> isn't something new to the Apple community. Hardware restrictions for OSs
> have been around for ages, in the case of Apple they just happen to add
> that it also has to be Apple branded - I think much like Microsoft specify
> Windows certified.


_______________________________________________
use-livecode mailing list
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode

Reply via email to