On 8/21/12 10:50 AM, Bob Sneidar wrote:
Hmmm now that I am thinking about it with a full cup of coffee surging through my veins, I seem to remember Jacque mentioning in the past that a background group really belongs to the stack as a whole from a certain point of view, although as Craig says, for the purposes of the message path it has to belong to some card, and may as well be the current card.
In my mental framework, a card group should belong to the card it's on, and a background group should be owned by the stack. But maybe that's just me.
-- Jacqueline Landman Gay | jac...@hyperactivesw.com HyperActive Software | http://www.hyperactivesw.com _______________________________________________ use-livecode mailing list use-livecode@lists.runrev.com Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode
