These equations are all imagined. In the end, the "intelligent" computer would just be doing exactly what it was programmed to do. As I said before, the appearance of random acts would be purely illusionary. A human can feel a mood swing coming on, and then make a choice as to whether or not to give in to it or else rise above it. Absent from all your equations is the notion that Souls make the final decisions. If you don't believe in Souls, well then you can easily theorize how AI might be possible. If you do, then you pretty much have to drop it. Unless you can find a way of giving a computer a self aware soul that is. I think the whole AI question really hinges on what you believe about our own natures.
Bob On Aug 1, 2012, at 8:32 AM, -=>JB<=- wrote: > If did not use the phrase "at this time" it would obviously limit > my ability to learn and explain things in the future. > > But given mood swings tend to cause irrational thinking as can > be seen in the "my girfriend" phrase it should not be too hard for > a computer to use certain events and respond irrationally. > > Mathmatically it could be done based on various things such as > the time of the month the computer is responding. > > -=>JB<=- _______________________________________________ use-livecode mailing list use-livecode@lists.runrev.com Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode
