On 07/26/2012 01:57 PM, Mark Schonewille wrote:
Hi Randy,
You can put an opaque field of thesame size behind the transparent field and
assign the same graphical effect to it. That way, you have one field that shows
dropshadow behind the text and another field with a dropshadow following the
outline.
Fudge.
Why does it seem that an awful lot of our time seems to consist of
finding "work arounds"?
And, does "work arounds" really mean circumventing the limitations of .
. . . ?
Somewhere (in Edinburgh, possibly) somebody ought to be keeping a tally
of the work arounds,
so that those work arounds are NOT necessary in the next recension of LC.
--
Best regards,
Mark Schonewille
Economy-x-Talk Consulting and Software Engineering
Homepage: http://economy-x-talk.com
Twitter: http://twitter.com/xtalkprogrammer
KvK: 50277553
Economy-x-Talk is looking for an amateur painter/cartoonist/poet etc. Contact
me http://qery.us/du
On 26 jul 2012, at 05:09, Randy Hengst wrote:
Thanks Scott,
That's kind of what I thought… but, was hoping for a way to assign to the text
and the outline of the field.
be well,
randy
_______________________________________________
use-livecode mailing list
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode
_______________________________________________
use-livecode mailing list
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode
