My second question... On Jul 17, 2012, at 11:02 PM, Mark Wieder wrote: > You may find some useful information in the notes to bug 1242.
>From the second part of the first tip by Trevor: > Usually I pass the following string through snprintf to SendCardMessage: > > global gDispatchRevolutionMessage;try;send \"%s > gDispatchRevolutionMessage\";catch errno;end try;put 0 into > gDispatchRevolutionMessage > > When using SendCardMessage in the context of an OS event I now use this > string: > > global gDispatchRevolutionMessage;try;send \"%s gDispatchRevolutionMessage\" > to > this card of this stack in 0 millisecs;catch errno;end try;put 0 into > gDispatchRevolutionMessage The use of try, presumably to catch errors in the send, is pretty clever. I wonder if there is a chance for a name collision for errno. Can errno clash with the context? I am not able to infer the function of gDispatchRevolutionMessage. What is that all about? Dar _______________________________________________ use-livecode mailing list use-livecode@lists.runrev.com Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode
