Hi, My problems with "Program Files" are: 1) It's read-only on typical post-XP PCs. So you can't save any data back to that folder, if that matters to you. You end up with more data scattered around the machine. 2) It's not obvious to average users, especially since MS "hides" the contents of "Program Files" by default.
We have customers who often want to move our program and their work to a Flash drive for mobile use. That makes "Program Files" a headache, so we default install to "My Documents", where the user always has read/write permissions and the app's folder is easily found if they need to go mobile with it. I'm sure the MS mothership frowns on this approach, but it works for customers and it works for us every since the release of Vista. Just some things to consider... -- Tom Bodine -- View this message in context: http://runtime-revolution.278305.n4.nabble.com/Program-Installation-folders-tp4599040p4606483.html Sent from the Revolution - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ use-livecode mailing list use-livecode@lists.runrev.com Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode
