I'm not sure I agree. AppGyver (AG) has many of the same api hooks to iOS as LC. So, in theory, one could just as easily abuse those privileges in an AG player as a LC player.
For instance, say you write an AG file (html/jscript) to access the native features of iOS like the contacts list, and copy them all and transport them somewhere over the Internet. That does something significantly *different* than what Safari can do. And, in my mind, it represents just as much a security risk as what you can do with LC. On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 4:38 AM, Mark Schonewille < m.schonewi...@economy-x-talk.com> wrote: > Hi, > > Just like PhoneGap, AppGyver is basically a locally functioning website > and does nothing that Safari can't do. If Apple has already approved the > engine, then Apple might tolerate the preview app. This doesn't pave the > way for RunRev to do something similar. > > _______________________________________________ use-livecode mailing list use-livecode@lists.runrev.com Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode
