On 04/18/2012 02:20 AM, Judy Perry wrote:
Not necessarily; they could still get listed here:
http://codeclub.org.uk/blog/
But then they'd need a canned set of lesson plans.
Certainly the Hackety-Hack website is rather well set out; and, frankly,
I much prefer what I can see there to the Scratch stuff (too Lego-like for
comfort).
Our friends (muffled cough) (are you reading this Kev?) could do well to
meditate on this a bit.
The kids who will be messing around with Hackety-Hack today will be
doing great things with Ruby very shortly.
I cannot see how RunRev would lose if they released, say, Dreamcard 2.6
as a FREE thing,
or, even, RR 2 (which had standalone building capabilities.
I know they want to earn money (and who doesn't????), that is quite
understandable; but I am sure releasing something
of the order of the above with a dozen reasonably well thought-out
lessons would bounce back in a financially favourable
way in due course.
Judy
On Tue, 17 Apr 2012, Richmond wrote:
Why do I feel that RunRev's "odd" behaviour with RevMedia has meant
that they may have missed an important chance?
_______________________________________________
use-livecode mailing list
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your
subscription preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode
_______________________________________________
use-livecode mailing list
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode
